<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Samuel’s Substack]]></title><description><![CDATA[My personal Substack]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:06:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.according2sam.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[samuelwinchester@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[samuelwinchester@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[samuelwinchester@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[samuelwinchester@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[ 'Slave Patrols' ]]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #427]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/slave-patrols</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/slave-patrols</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:27:35 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/208774871/faa9183e622bd90eb803ef7066747279.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slave patrols played an important role in the Antebellum South. They were groups of armed men who monitored, controlled, and policed slaves while enforcing the system of slavery. One of their primary functions was to prevent slaves from escaping. They conducted patrols along rivers and in remote areas to stop escape attempts by boat or along less-traveled routes. If a slave did manage to escape, slave patrols were responsible for tracking them down and returning them to captivity. They also participated in the punishment of captured runaways, often through public acts of violence intended to deter others from attempting to escape. What is a modern-day equivalent to slave patrols, and how is it actively working to stop more black men from leaving the Democratic Party? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #427.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Agitate']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #426]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/agitate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/agitate</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 03:10:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/208393299/57768d47eb7ce34b07912c30bf5edfc5.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been nearly a decade since Colin Kaepernick began sitting on the bench during the national anthem of NFL preseason games in 2016. That year was also an election year. As Kaepernick's protest evolved from sitting on the bench to kneeling on the sideline, the reasons behind the protest also started to change. Players on other teams joined him by kneeling during the anthem, and the demonstration quickly became a national topic of debate. Many everyday citizens posted photos of themselves kneeling on social media. The protest became increasingly controversial, with some viewing it as a stand against racial injustice, while others saw it as disrespectful to the flag and the military. As a result, the issue became deeply racial, and during a presidential election year, it also became a political issue. How was Kaepernick's protest co-opted and used by political actors to mobilize voters in the 2016 election? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #426.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Socialist Democrats']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #425]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/socialist-democrats</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/socialist-democrats</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:56:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/207849567/60f4b4e339aed62661c25684f51a5451.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise of Marxist influence within the Democratic Party is not only threatening the party's chances of regaining power in this year's midterm elections, but it could also pose a broader challenge to its long-term unity. Several prominent moderates, including Bill Maher and Senator John Fetterman, have suggested that they would leave the party if the Marxists gained control of it. They are not the only centrist Democrats to express such concerns. Congressman Steve Cohen also left the Congressional Progressive Caucus after nearly half of House Democrats voted in favor of legislation that would end U.S. aid to Israel, an issue that has become a major priority for members of the party's left wing. What other policies supported by the Marxist Democrats are leading some moderates to question their future in the party? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #425.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Foreign & Domestic']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #424]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/foreign-and-domestic</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/foreign-and-domestic</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:36:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/207487178/fa89add62717229e0a5d8a629250d009.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The phrase &#8220;against all enemies, foreign and domestic&#8221; appears in the oath of office taken by U.S. military personnel, federal employees, and members of Congress, committing them to defend the Constitution against threats from both outside and within the United States. Yet, as a nation, we tend to focus primarily on external enemies and foreign threats, while rarely considering the possibility of domestic threats to our way of life. When someone does raise concerns about a potential domestic threat, those concerns are often quickly dismissed as conspiracy theories. We assume that all serious threats come from abroad and that none exist at home. If that were truly the case, however, why does the oath require defending the Constitution against enemies who are domestic? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #424.</span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Brothers']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #423]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/brothers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/brothers</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 01:46:27 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/206936719/e3d43932f073fcad7d47d59cfa5f989d.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George W. Bush has often referred to Bill Clinton as his brother&#8212;once even calling him &#8220;my brother from another mother.&#8221; George W. Bush has also said that his mother considered Clinton to be her fourth son. Barbara Bush herself once remarked in an interview that, because Clinton never knew his father, George H. W. Bush had become something of a surrogate father to him. There is no question that Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush had a close relationship that transcended politics. However, if Bush truly became a father figure to Clinton, when did that paternal relationship begin? And &#8212; if Clinton regarded George H. W. Bush as a surrogate father, does that mean George H. W. Bush had two &#8220;sons&#8221; who became presidents of the United States in succession after himself? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #423.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['The Heel']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #422]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/the-heel</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/the-heel</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:47:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/206504705/3f58426973512d5081fe3a1e70775800.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In professional wrestling, the &#8216;heel&#8217; plays an essential role. The heel is the villain&#8212;the character the audience is meant to dislike and root against, in contrast to the hero. Although the heel and the hero cooperate behind the scenes to put on the match, the audience is expected to see them as genuine adversaries. The heel's job is twofold. First, he must make the audience despise him. The louder the boos and jeers, the more effectively he is performing his role. Second, he must make the audience love the hero. The more passionately the crowd cheers for the hero, the more successful the heel has been. In what ways is American politics like professional wrestling? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #422.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Demoralization']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #421]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/demoralization</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/demoralization</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 23:29:16 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/205678725/9d60eb143e01145cda466a5bb47a6f2c.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN data analyst Harry Enten aired a segment on July 4, the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, examining polling on how proud Americans are of their country. The polling indicated that Democrats, particularly younger Democrats, are much less likely than Republicans to say they are proud of the United States. During the segment, Enten said that only 36% of Democrats described themselves as &#8220;extremely&#8221; or &#8220;very&#8221; proud to be American, compared with 92% of Republicans. What role, if any, does demoralization play in the lower levels of national pride reported among Democrats? Is it possible that Americans are being intentionally demoralized, and if so, by whom and for what purpose? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #421.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Marxism Crisis']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #420]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/marxism-crisis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/marxism-crisis</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 02:37:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/204205557/1506d800e0f0ebbb5f75641ee7ce212a.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many establishment Democrats seem surprised that socialists are gaining influence within their party, as if they slept through the past decade and have only now woken up. In 2016, Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, came close to winning the Democratic presidential nomination. Without the party&#8217;s superdelegate system and other actions by the DNC, he might have succeeded. In 2020, Sanders again emerged as a leading contender, but his rivals withdrew from the race and consolidated their support behind Joe Biden, effectively blocking Sanders&#8217;s path to the nomination. The rise socialism in the United States should not surprise anyone. The conditions have created an environment that is ideal for socialism. How did conditions in the United States become so conducive to the spread of socialism? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #420.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Tribalism Crisis']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #419]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/tribalism-crisis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/tribalism-crisis</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 23:19:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/203762649/6f3ce74dea855c81d52bef1c61ff926d.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest challenges facing the United States as it approaches the nation's 250th birthday is tribalism, particularly racial tribalism. In many respects, the country appears more racially divided today than it did 50 years ago, at the time of its 200th birthday. This may seem counterintuitive because, as society becomes more diverse and pluralistic, one might expect race relations to improve. In many ways they have, and it would be inaccurate to suggest that no progress has been made. Nevertheless, there are also indications that racial polarization has increased over the past 50 years. What accounts for this apparent deterioration in race relations in the United States, and was it intentional? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #419.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Treason Crisis']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #418]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/treason-crisis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/treason-crisis</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:00:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/203176029/d4aa163cfe83efc19638e3d3c0bd402b.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is widely regarded as one of the most powerful nations in history. It possesses one of the world&#8217;s most advanced militaries, equipped with sophisticated weapons, technology, and global capabilities. As a result, conquering the United States through a conventional military invasion would present an enormous challenge for any adversary. Additionally, the country&#8217;s large and heavily armed civilian population would further complicate such an effort. But an enemy seeking to weaken the United States might find greater success by exploiting internal divisions and undermining national institutions from within. That is why treason has long been viewed as a serious threat to national security. Why does treason represent one of the United States&#8217; greatest vulnerabilities, and what are some examples of actions that might be characterized as treasonous today? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #418.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['The Carrot']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #417]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/the-carrot</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/the-carrot</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 23:18:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/202778963/9fcdb72880ef8e4763edd2a1505b4bde.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people are unhappy with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) the United States is considering with Iran. They believe the Trump administration is offering too many concessions and would prefer military pressure to continue. However, many of these critics may not fully understand Trump&#8217;s strategy. Trump appears to be employing a &#8220;carrot-and-stick&#8221; approach. After several months of applying pressure&#8212;the stick&#8212;he is now offering incentives&#8212;the carrot. It is up to Iran whether it accepts those incentives or faces additional pressure. President Trump has been clear that the stick, meaning further military action, remains an option. At the same time, he wants to give the carrot an opportunity to work by potentially releasing billions of dollars in Iranian funds and easing sanctions to allow investment and economic growth. Does Trump&#8217;s strategy have a chance of succeeding, and what happens if it does not? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #417.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Education Crisis']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #416]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/education-crisis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/education-crisis</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:13:44 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/202198987/725fee56d47373ae49cb3302fee60875.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahm Emanuel, former chief of staff to President Barack Obama and former mayor of Chicago, wrote an op-ed in &#8216;The Wall Street&#8217; Journal last fall titled &#8220;Democrats Need an Education Reset.&#8221; Emanuel, who is expected to run for president in 2028, argues that the United States faces an education crisis. He wrote the piece in response to a government report on results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, which found troubling levels of student achievement. According to the report, only 31% of eighth-grade students are proficient in science, 22% of high school seniors are proficient in math, and 35% are proficient in reading. In the op-ed, Emanuel writes, &#8220;We&#8217;ve spent the past five years debating pronouns without noticing that too many students can&#8217;t tell you what a pronoun is.&#8221; What is the source of the education crisis? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #416.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Election Crisis']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #415]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/election-crisis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/election-crisis</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 22:45:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/201806234/43c52d934242c40fb181a48f2f12e880.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent California primary election took nearly a week to certify the winners. In an age of modern technology and rapid transportation, that is a considerable amount of time. Many jurisdictions with fewer resources than California, and with similar or even larger numbers of voters, are able to certify their election results within 24 hours of the polls closing. This has caused some people to have argued that California&#8217;s election process increases the potential for fraud or other irregularities because of the length of time required to certify the results. President Trump has been among the most prominent voices expressing this concern, but many other California residents have also voiced distrust in the election process. How does California&#8217;s mail-in voting system contribute to the time required to certify election results, and is mail-in voting trustworthy? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #415.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Heresies']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #414]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/heresies</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/heresies</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:08:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/201229680/8072e90a6ac7ff18cf6212ad1baeb269.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, a controversy erupted when Utah Senator Mike Lee posted a photo of the Pentagon&#8217;s revised list of religions it recognizes for observance. Lee wrote, &#8220;Can anyone tell me why The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was left out of the list of Christian churches?&#8221; The Pentagon had added the word &#8220;Christian&#8221; to the names of several denominations but listed only The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints without a Christian designation. He argued that the LDS Church should have received the same label. His post sparked widespread discussion and debate over whether the LDS Church should&#8217;ve been included with other Christians. What did Joseph Smith teach about other Christian denominations? Did he view the LDS Church as simply another Christian denomination, or did he see it as a distinct, unique, church? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #414.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Simon Magus']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #413]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/simon-magus</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/simon-magus</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:13:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/200823794/79b9cb4b588c9c86d7fa31a440f9bba5.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Magus, also known as Simon the Sorcerer, is a figure mentioned in the Book of Acts. He was a Samaritan who, according to Acts, amazed the people of Samaria with his sorcery and claimed to be someone great. The passage states: &#8220;All the people, both high and low, gave him their attention..." When the Apostle Philip came to Samaria and performed signs and miracles through the power of the Holy Spirit, Simon was astonished and professed belief. Later, he offered the Apostle Peter money in exchange for the ability to confer the Holy Spirit on others. Peter sharply rebuked him for this attempt to purchase the Holy Spirit. According to early Christian tradition, what became of Simon Magus after these events, and which early Christian heresy is he believed to have founded? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #413.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Against Heresies']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #412]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/against-heresies</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/against-heresies</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:06:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/200211391/0ced5b3275af5ae2e3f723a08b3d6a94.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the 2nd through the 4th centuries, many different Christian movements, or denominations, emerged throughout the Roman Empire. These included the Gnostics, Marcionists, Modalists, Arians, and many others. Most of these groups were considered heretical by the broader Christian community, but some began to attract increasing numbers of converts and grew in influence. As these movements spread, there arose a need to distinguish their teachings from the doctrine handed down by the Apostles. This concern motivated Irenaeus, Bishop of Lugdunum, when he wrote &#8216;Against Heresies&#8217; around AD 180. How did Irenaeus develop the concept of apostolic succession, and how did he use it to argue for the authority of the Christian Church to be in Rome? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #412.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Road Less Traveled']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #411]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/road-less-traveled</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/road-less-traveled</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 23:03:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/199800262/9138b7743cddba617021dd1a13d7ad5f.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Road Less Traveled is a very popular nonfiction book that was published in 1978. Since then, it has sold millions of copies. It was written by the late Morgan Scott Peck, a clinical psychiatrist. Peck was raised in a Quaker family in New York City, which means he grew up familiar with the Bible. In The Road Less Traveled, he attempts to combine his knowledge of the Bible and the teachings of Jesus with psychiatry. Written during the era of the self-help movement, the book sought to teach people how to achieve the benefits of Christianity without Jesus. This is why it is called The Road Less Traveled. What did Jesus say about the broad road and the narrow road, and how does that relate to Peck&#8217;s book? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #411.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Petros']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #410]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/petros</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/petros</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 03:06:54 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/199266755/8ac7f292d3d8ef76608b4e4b26a08203.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An analogy often used in the Bible for the Christian Church is the human body. The Church is called the Body of Christ, though it is not a literal body; the description is figurative. Catholic doctrine teaches that the Pope is the head of the Church, and therefore, within the analogy, the Pope would be the head of the body. Catholics believe that Jesus made the Apostle Peter the head of the Church when He said, &#8220;I tell you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church...&#8221; Because Peter was first Pope, each successive Pope is viewed as the new head of the Church and, by extension, the head of the figurative body. However, is the Pope truly the head of the body, or does the Bible identify someone else as the head? According to Scripture, who is the head of the Church? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #410.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Breaking News']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #409]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/breaking-news</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/breaking-news</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:01:58 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/198330219/f15bf9316fccd3c008b4870b45b0cdb5.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Breaking News&#8221; used to mean something truly urgent &#8212; major events unfolding in real time that were important enough to interrupt whatever you were doing. That&#8217;s what &#8220;breaking&#8221; meant. News outlets were literally breaking into regular programming because the public needed the information immediately. But in the age of modern communication &#8212; with the internet, social media, and 24-hour news networks &#8212; &#8220;Breaking News&#8221; has become more about cutting through media overload and grabbing attention than signaling something truly extraordinary. How did people share important news before all this technology &#8212; before radio, television, or the internet? And how did the most significant breaking news story in human history spread across the world without any of it? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #409.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA['Authority']]></title><description><![CDATA[According2Sam #408]]></description><link>https://www.according2sam.com/p/authority</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.according2sam.com/p/authority</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Winchester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:23:16 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/197911435/e4a205bd448ed6a9e18dc4ada4affd9d.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 50 years, the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has been requesting an audience with the Vatican to discuss efforts to modernize the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. They have pushed for this dialogue during the papacies of John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis, but have been denied. Now, during the papacy of Leo XVIII, things have come to a head. They will likely be excommunicated from the Catholic Church on the first day of July after consecrating new bishops within their society outside the authority of the Holy See. The SSPX seems prepared to accept this excommunication and does not appear to be particularly troubled by it. Does excommunication from the Church mean they will also be separated from Jesus? If not, why would excommunication be viewed as a threat? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #408.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>