Accoding2Sam

Episode #127: 'Dereliction of Duty'  

Direct link: [link] 

 

After throwing every charge possible at Donald Trump to see if anything sticks to him Liz Cheney and her Democrat allies have settle on 'dereliction of duty'. They first claimed that President Trump incited his supporters to commit violence in an attempt to foment a coup d'etat and overthrow the government, but now they have made a more obscure accusation that they believe will be easier for the public to accept. Their focus now is on the 187 minutes of the riot at the Capitol and the actions taken by the president to stop it. Liz Cheney says that President Trump's inaction to stop the riot represents the most serious dereliction of duty of any president in American history. However, she may be overlooking the administration that her father served in as Vice President. The Bush administration was warned many times in the spring and summer of 2001 that Sunni fundamentalist were in the United States and that they were planning a terrorist attack. Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to stop it, they made no attempt to warn the American people. Three thousand Americans were killed on their watch. How does this dereliction of duty compare to that of other presidents in American history? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #127.

​* Host, Producer, Engineer​:

  Samuel C Winchester

  Contact: [link]

Podcast Archive: [link]

Please help According2Sam to keep bringing you valuabe content. Thank you! 

Blog Post

Samuel C. Winchester | June 21, 2022                                                

If you haven’t yet realized that the House Select Committee looking into the riot at the Capitol is nothing more than political theater how much more do you need to see? Maybe you didn’t get it after they narrowed their focus to only investigating the violence on January 6, 2021 and not any of the other political violence that caused billions of dollars in damage in 2020. Perhaps it still didn’t sink in after Democrats bullied the minority and prevented them from adding the members to the committee that they wanted, those who would challenge the charade and expose it. If you still didn’t get the picture after they hired an ABC Disney producer to stage manage their show and sell it to the public like TV dinners, it should be clear to you now after the first few public hearings. 

 

The most insidious thing about the January 6 Committee hearings is the talking point that it is not a trial and therefore doesn’t demand due process. What makes this so deceitful is that it attempts to justify shutting out any opposition while holding trial in the court of public opinion. They can say literally anything without any pushback whatsoever, and they have. The media only amplifies the story the committee is telling, and then they all point to public opinion polls to apply pressure on the DOJ to prosecute the former president.

 

It would be legal malpractice for the Attorney General to charge President Trump with anything based on these hearings. President Trump has been unrepresented throughout this entire performance and completely shutout of the process. His side of the story has gone untold. However, in a criminal case not only would Present Trump get a voice and a legal defense, he would have access to all discovery and his lawyers would have the opportunity to cross-examine witness. A conviction would be a very high bar for prosecutors.

 

 Continue... [link]

Blog Archive: [link]

  • Black YouTube Icon
  • IMG_4698
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
images-4.jpeg
  • Black YouTube Icon
  • IMG_4698
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
Political-5.png